In Reg v Govinda the points of distinction between the provisions of the following sections of the IPC were explained :-

34 and 149 [Now, Sections 3(5) and 190 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023]

302 and 304 [Now, Sections 103 and 105 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023]

299 and 300 [Now, Sections 100 and 101 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023]

403 and 405 [Now, Sections 314 and 316(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023]

In which of the following leading cases, Justice Vivian Bose distinguished culpable homicide and murder?

Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1958 SC 465

Shivaji Sahabrao Bobode v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1973 SC 2622

Rudul Shah v. State of Bihar, AIR 1983 SC 1086

State of A.P. v. R. Punnayya case deals with distinction between which of following sections of Indian Penal Code?

Section 501 and 502 [Now, Secs. 356(3) and 356(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023]

Sections 299 and 300 [Now, Secs. 100 and 101 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023]

Section 304A and 304B [Now, Secs. 106 and 80 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023]

Section 305 and 306 [Now, Secs. 107 and 108 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023]

Which of the following cases is considered as locus classicus on Section 300 thirdly of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Now, Clause (c) of Section 101 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023]?

Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra

In which of the following landmark case, a three Judges' Bench of the Supreme Court prescribed four point test relating to Section 300, thirdly, of I.P.C. [Now, Clause (c) of Section 101 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023] :-

Virsa Singh vs. State of Punjab; AIR 1958 SC 465.

State of U.P. vs. Ramesh Prasad Misra; (1996) 10 SCC 360.

K.M. Nanavati vs. State of Maharashtra; AIR 1962 SC 605.

Nehru @ Jawahar vs. State AIR 2008 SC 2574

Which Chapter of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 lays down offences regarding religion?

offences affecing the public health, safety, convenience, decency and morals

offences relating to weights and measures

offences affecting the human body

Damaging or defiling a place of worship to insult the religion of any class carries imprisonment up to:

imprisonment upto six months or fine or both

imprisonment upto one year or fine or both

imprisonment upto two years or fine or both

imprisonment upto three years or fine or both

Which religious offence carries the highest maximum penalty under the BNS, 2023?

Injuring or defiling place of worship with intent to insult the religion of any class

Deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs

Uttering words etc. with deliberate intent to wound religious feelings

📖 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)•🎯 14 Practice MCQs

Chapter XVI: Offences Relating to Religion (Sections 298–302)

Chapter-wise objective questions with statutory bare act articles, landmark Supreme Court case laws, and past judicial service citations.

reg-v-govindasection-100section-101virsa-singhvivian-boserr-punnayya3rdlychapter-16religion-offencessection-298defiling-place-worshipsection-299

Loading 14 Statutory MCQs...

Chapter XVI: Offences Relating to Religion (Sections 298–302) • 14 Questions

📚 Chapter Practice Coverage

This practice module for Chapter XVI: Offences Relating to Religion (Sections 298–302) contains 14 Multiple Choice Questions tailored for State Judicial Service Preliminary Examinations (including UP PCS-J, Delhi Judicial Service, Bihar Judiciary, MP Judiciary, Rajasthan Judicial Service), CLAT LL.M, All India Bar Examination (AIBE), and UGC-NET Law.

← All BNS Chapters•Custom Practice Sets →